On 03/05/2010 09:52 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Author: jonathan
Date: Fri Mar 5 21:52:42 2010
New Revision: 919632
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919632&view=rev
Log:
Tests for presence of xqilla/ast/XQEffectiveBooleanValue.hpp; if not
present, sets a constant to enable legacy API for effective boolean
value.
Modified:
qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/configure.ac
Modified: qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/configure.ac
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/configure.ac?rev=919632&r1=919631&r2=919632&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/configure.ac (original)
+++ qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/configure.ac Fri Mar 5 21:52:42 2010
@@ -346,6 +346,8 @@
test $want_xml = no&& use_xml=no
+
+
# If the user doesn't say not to use XML, see if it's available.
if test $use_xml != no; then
# Then see if XQilla is available
@@ -364,6 +366,13 @@
# Else XQilla is available - use it to build
test $use_xml = yes&&
AC_DEFINE([HAVE_XML], [1], [Compile-in XML Exchange support.])
+
+ # Check to see if we need to use legacy calls for effective boolean value
+ xqilla_has_ebv=yes
+ AC_CHECK_HEADER([xqilla/ast/XQEffectiveBooleanValue.hpp], ,
[xqilla_has_ebv=no])
+ test $xqilla_has_ebv = no&&
+ AC_DEFINE([XQILLA_2_1_3], [1], [Use the old XQilla 2.1.3 API to get
effective boolean value.])
+
fi
This seems like either a poorly named define or the wrong test. (E.g.
the header isn't in xqilla 2.0.0 either, which is currently supported).
Did you perhaps mean to set XQILLA_BEFORE_2_2_3 here? That is now
checked for in XmlExchange.cpp but doesn't seem to be defined anywhere.
These changes also break the build where the new header file is not present.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
