Hi again!
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:08:29AM +0100, Ján Sáreník wrote:
> I do not think I have voting right (yet), but I am watching the
> evolution of qpid-0.6 since the first candidates and I am very
> thankful for such a team of developers who do things precisely.
Ehm, excuse me, I really did not give it a try though I was
watching the discussion regarding the previous candidates.
In the attached log there are two things I would like to point out:
1. Released tarball should contain developer-generated configure
script and not require the user to have all the autotools stuff.
2. The error on cluster tests - I did not investigate much, but
what I know is that the environment I am compiling in is able
to cleanly compile, check and install current trunk (including
the cluster module).
What I have here:
fedora-release-12-2.noarch
corosynclib-devel-1.2.0-1.fc12.x86_64
including the needed records in /etc/corosync/uidgid.d
That's my few cents. Sorry to be that late as I do not want to
delay the release any more.
Best regards, Jasan
--
Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality Assurance Associate
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
