I do have the same concern as Robbie. There were several incidents where changes were made in one and not the other. Now that there was ample time for all concerned to get a feel for both build systems, I believe it's time we get rid of one.
Rajith On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 March 2010 14:56, Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 16:30 +0200, Ján Sáreník wrote: > <snip> >> Unfortunately the approach of unconditionally linking boost_system >> doesn't work for boost versions prior to 1.35 (or somewhere close to >> there) we already have some conditional logic in the cmake build to deal >> correctly with this, i must say I thought we already had this in the >> autotools build as well, but it becomes difficult to remember the >> details of 2 build systems. >> > </snip> > > Is there any plan to migrate and ease the burden of having 2 systems? > It seems like a long time since the CMake system was added with that > intent. > > Robbie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
