[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17681013#comment-17681013
]
Daniil Kirilyuk commented on QPID-8619:
---------------------------------------
Thank you for clarification.
Following endpoint can be used:
{noformat}
GET
/api/latest/virtualhostaccesscontrolprovider/default/default/default{noformat}
producing the output
{code:java}
{
"id" : "a7ca4d04-9c99-48f5-bdc3-9557ca2cfdb9",
"name" : "default",
"type" : "RuleBased",
"desiredState" : "ACTIVE",
"state" : "ACTIVE",
"durable" : true,
"lifetimePolicy" : "PERMANENT",
"defaultResult" : "DENIED",
"lastOpenedTime" : 1674743093329,
"priority" : 10,
"rules" : [ {
"objectType" : "EXCHANGE",
"attributes" : {
"ROUTING_KEY" : "onramp",
"NAME" : ""
},
"outcome" : "ALLOW_LOG",
"identity" : "service-providers",
"operation" : "PUBLISH"
}, {
"objectType" : "VIRTUALHOST",
"attributes" : {
"NAME" : "localhost"
},
"outcome" : "ALLOW_LOG",
"identity" : "service-providers",
"operation" : "ACCESS"
}, {
"objectType" : "VIRTUALHOST",
"attributes" : {
"NAME" : "localhost"
},
"outcome" : "ALLOW_LOG",
"identity" : "clients-private-channels",
"operation" : "ACCESS"
}, {
"objectType" : "QUEUE",
"attributes" : {
"NAME" : "bi-queue"
},
"outcome" : "ALLOW_LOG",
"identity" : "ALL",
"operation" : "CONSUME"
}, {
"objectType" : "ALL",
"attributes" : { },
"outcome" : "ALLOW_LOG",
"identity" : "admin",
"operation" : "ALL"
} ],
"createdTime" : 1674743091325
} {code}
> Easier ACL interface for REST management (JSON output?)
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-8619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8619
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Broker-J
> Affects Versions: qpid-java-broker-9.0.0
> Reporter: Kyrre
> Priority: Minor
>
> We use the management interface over HTTPS to create queues and exchanges, as
> well as managing ACLs to give and remove access to said queues and exchanges.
> We have lots of extra code to parse ACLs from the management interface, which
> is brittle and prone to braking. The ACLs are stored in the config.json as
> JSON, and then transformed to a bespoke format returned to the client, which
> then has to parse this format for manipulation. Would it not be much easier
> to just return the JSON, which is a lot easier to parse?
> If there's code/clients that require the bespoke format, maybe return JSON on
> a parameter/request header?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
