On 03/10/2011 04:56 PM, Marnie McCormack wrote:
I think we'd need to have a vote thread to redo the versioning approac -
which is effectively what this implies if I'v eunderstood correctly ?
I don't like the scheme we've got but iirc it was discussed at length and
voted in.
However, the harder task to do which involves (at least this is how I've
done it in the past) looking for subversion commits on all open/in-flight
0-9 items to figure out what actually made it into the 0-10 release
(regardless of status on JIRA since it's not a reliable guide for commit).
On the c++ side I believe the status is now a reasonable guide.
Is there a smarter way to be sure about content ?
Marnie
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Rajith Attapattu<rajit...@gmail.com>wrote:
+1
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Gordon Sim<g...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 03/10/2011 03:14 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
Yeah, if folks want to press ahead, I'm for it.
Me too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
