> > From what I understood, the primary reason Danushka is looking to have a > virtual host per tenant is for access control. > Is that correct ? >
Plus object distinction. For an example, users in different tenants should be able to create a destination with the same name but they should have distinct names in the broker. So tenant T1 and T2 should be able to create queue Q so that they have distinct names in the broker. (say T1-Q and T2-Q) > That is each tenant has a unique id/prefix/name and all exchanges and > queues setup for them can use this prefix. > Rajith, will this help the scenario that I have mentioned above?. If so then I am through :-). Thank you!. Thanks, Danushka
