----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1690/#review1721 -----------------------------------------------------------
/branches/qpid-3346/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Consumer.h <https://reviews.apache.org/r/1690/#comment3927> Why change the meaning of an existing member rather than introduce a new member like id? - Alan On 2011-08-31 20:37:49, Kenneth Giusti wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/1690/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-08-31 20:37:49) > > > Review request for qpid. > > > Summary > ------- > > Update to message group development: > > Created a functional test tool that verifies message group behavior across > multiple clients consuming from a single queue. > > Also, bugfix: the "tag" used to identify a Consumer is not unique beyond the > consumer's session. Queue's need to track consumers across different > sessions, and using the tag was not unique enough. I've introduced a > consumer name that is generated on the broker and should be unique > broker-wide. > > > This addresses bug qpid-3346. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/qpid-3346 > > > Diffs > ----- > > /branches/qpid-3346/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Consumer.h 1158073 > /branches/qpid-3346/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SemanticState.h 1158073 > /branches/qpid-3346/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SemanticState.cpp 1158073 > /branches/qpid-3346/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/cluster/UpdateClient.cpp 1158073 > /branches/qpid-3346/qpid/cpp/src/tests/Makefile.am 1158073 > /branches/qpid-3346/qpid/cpp/src/tests/msg_group_test.cpp PRE-CREATION > /branches/qpid-3346/qpid/cpp/src/tests/run_msg_group_tests PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1690/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > One simple functional test as an example - will flesh out the test script > with multiple runs of the tool with different consumer and producer settings. > > > Thanks, > > Kenneth > >
