-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2335/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated 2011-10-12 16:15:37.240703)


Review request for qpid, Gordon Sim and Ted Ross.


Changes
-------

A complete patch, including additional tests.

The performance does drop as expected when enabled, but the perf when disabled 
does not appear to degenerate from current trunk.

Patch w/o timestamping enabled:

[root@mrg44 tests]# qpid-cpp-benchmark --repeat=5 --summarize --messages=5000000
send-tp         recv-tp l-min   l-max   l-avg
68834           68794   0.18    47.48   3.77
69200           69158   0.20    59.15   4.14
69116           69074   0.16    44.76   3.77
69273           69270   0.19    120.19  4.62
68360           68320   0.17    59.79   3.96

And enabled:

[root@mrg44 src]# ./qpidd -d --auth no --enable-timestamp=yes
[root@mrg44 src]# ps aux | grep qpidd
root     19248  0.0  0.0 135624  3544 ?        Ssl  11:59   0:00 
/root/kgiusti/qpid/cpp/src/.libs/lt-qpidd -d --auth no --enable-timestamp=yes
root     19259  0.0  0.0  61180   772 pts/0    S+   11:59   0:00 grep qpidd
[root@mrg44 src]# qpid-cpp-benchmark --repeat=5 --summarize --messages=5000000
send-tp         recv-tp l-min   l-max   l-avg
65561           65523   0.19    43.84   3.88
64773           64739   0.17    43.86   4.06
66266           66225   0.19    142.72  5.48
64238           64203   0.18    43.09   4.29
66369           66333   0.17    70.70   4.23


Summary
-------

A slight deviation from the design originally proposed in QPID-3417 - this 
change adds the timestamp delivery property to messages using the relatively 
simple approach as described in AMQP-0.10.

Other than the approach itself, the QMF management interface & schema changes 
seem like I could be guilty of overkill - I'd like feedback before I go too far 
down that hole...


This addresses bug qpid-3417.
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/qpid-3417


Diffs (updated)
-----

  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Broker.h 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Broker.cpp 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Message.h 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Message.cpp 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SemanticState.cpp 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/SessionState.cpp 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/client/amqp0_10/IncomingMessages.cpp 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/management/ManagementAgent.cpp 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/tests/BrokerOptions.cpp PRE-CREATION 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/tests/Makefile.am 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/tests/QueueTest.cpp 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/tests/acl.py 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/java/broker/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/qmf/QMFService.java 
1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/specs/management-schema.xml 1182419 
  /trunk/qpid/tests/src/py/qpid_tests/broker_0_10/management.py 1182419 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2335/diff


Testing
-------

One unit test to verify the timestamp is being added.  No dynamic control via 
mgmt yet.  

Simple perf testing didn't seem like the hit wasn't too bad so far:

Pre patch, from trunk:
[root@mrg44 tests]# qpid-cpp-benchmark --repeat=5 --summarize --messages=5000000
send-tp         recv-tp l-min   l-max   l-avg
68428           68388   0.16    69.59   4.16
68238           68201   0.17    44.18   3.82
68622           68581   0.16    102.52  4.60
68688           68647   0.18    117.33  5.29
69142           69104   0.19    103.30  4.50


Patched, no timestamping:
[root@mrg44 src]# qpid-cpp-benchmark --repeat=5 --summarize --messages=5000000
send-tp         recv-tp l-min   l-max   l-avg
67543           67471   0.17    79.76   4.37
69069           69028   0.15    42.92   3.78
68481           68439   0.17    45.91   3.98
68674           68636   0.18    41.30   3.74
67588           67587   0.17    60.23   4.21


Patched, timestamping enabled:
[root@mrg44 src]# qpid-cpp-benchmark --repeat=5 --summarize --messages=5000000
send-tp         recv-tp l-min   l-max   l-avg
67228           67227   0.21    41.80   3.97
67697           67659   0.19    43.01   4.19
67405           67368   0.19    101.61  4.99
66515           66511   0.15    41.85   4.10
67664           67622   0.17    47.35   4.01


Thanks,

Kenneth

Reply via email to