On 28 Oct 2011, at 01h16, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Lets see the patch whether its too late or not.. ? > > Robbie > > On 26 October 2011 23:33, Andrew Kennedy <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> >> Is it too late to get in a simple change to the build process for 0.14? I'd >> like to turn on Maven and OSGi artifact generation for the broker. Initial >> testing locally looks good, and it's just a couple of lines per 'build.xml' >> file, so I can submit a patch immediately if it's not a problem. We'd just >> publish the Maven artifacts in the same way as the client - broker and >> management-common libraries are all that's needed.
Ok, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3558 I haven't committed it because I wasn't sure about moving the test code in bdbstore. I assume there would be no legal problem publishing the bdbstore Maven artifact, since it simply links to the Sleepycat licensed Jar in the POM dependencies? I expect the OSGi MANIFEST .bnd file for the broker will need attention, and am working on this as part of a feature for using a Qpid broker inside the Apache Karaf container, similar to the activemq-karaf capability. Cheers, Andrew. -- -- andrew d kennedy ? PHONE_MISSING: http://grkvlt.blogspot.com/ ; --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
