Working with both, I've found "git pull" to be *much* faster than "svn
update". It's also much easier to specify which changed files you want
committed/posted. That said, they're both good. If you don't want the
full jump to Git perhaps Qpid can practice with Apache's Git Mirror
while still being on SVN. CXF does that
(http://cxf.apache.org/source-repository.html#SourceRepository-Usinggit)
and maybe a third (?) of the CXF team uses it instead of SVN.
Glen
On 11/28/2011 04:39 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
it is a lot easier to merge features, and work with others on changes.
Carl.
On 11/28/2011 04:19 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
What benefit is there to using git?
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:38 PM
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: GIT
The ASF board is expanding the use of GIT, in the trial group for the
ASF. Do
we want to take the plunge?
Carl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
--
Glen Mazza
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com
blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
