[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164453#comment-13164453
]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3666:
-----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3052/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for qpid and Ted Ross.
Summary
-------
Not very pretty, but seems to be the correct solution.
This addresses bug qpid-3666.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/qpid-3666
Diffs
-----
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/management/ManagementAgent.cpp 1211460
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3052/diff
Testing
-------
unit.
Thanks,
Kenneth
> QMF v1 method requests may fail if new object's id overlaps an old deleted
> object.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-3666
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3666
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++ Broker
> Affects Versions: 0.14
> Reporter: Ken Giusti
> Assignee: Ken Giusti
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.15
>
>
> If a broker object, such as a queue, is created, deleted, and re-created, the
> new(est) QMF management object is still indexed by the old key value. This
> is OK for QMF v2 keys, but v1 keys contain a sequence number which is not
> correctly updated. This may result in v1 queries for the new object to fail.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
