[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rob Godfrey updated QPID-3774:
------------------------------

    Status: Ready To Review  (was: In Progress)
    
> [Java Broker] Allow out of order completion of persistent enqueues / dequeues
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-3774
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3774
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java Broker, Java Broker BDB Store
>    Affects Versions: 0.14
>            Reporter: Rob Godfrey
>            Assignee: Rob Godfrey
>             Fix For: 0.15
>
>
> Currently each persistent enqueue or dequeue in a non transactional session 
> is processed in strict order with a synchronous write occurring for each 
> enqueue/dequeue.
> In order to improve performance we should make these enqueues/dequeues 
> asynchronous and only wait for completion when a sync is requested.
> Note that due to the way the IO layer works, we cannot make this truly 
> asynchronous as we need to synchronize before control is handed back to the 
> IO layer as it then performs a blocking read.  if the client is waiting for 
> the completion from the broker it will never send more data on the wire, and 
> since the read is blocking the broker cannot check to see if the async write 
> to disk has completed.  In practice tests have shown that this does not 
> significantly change the maximum possible throughput. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to