Thank you for reply. Broker and the tests are ran locally.
We are using supplied tests perftest and latencytest. We are getting about 12k/sec Testing messages are 64k Box is a windows box with 4 cores, 4G of ram. Alex Cheers, Alex -----Original Message----- From: "Steve Huston" <shus...@riverace.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:25:57 To: <dev@qpid.apache.org>; 'Alex Friedman'<shurick231...@yahoo.com>; <us...@qpid.apache.org> Subject: RE: c++ broker question Hi Alex, What did you use to drive the tests and where is it running (and what does that box look like)? What size messages? What does "latency about 12 per second" mean? Thanks, -Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Friedman [mailto:shurick231...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 8:59 PM > To: dev@qpid.apache.org; us...@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Fw: c++ broker question > > Hi, > > We set up a 0.14 c++ broker on the windows box with 4 cores, 100mb > network. > Doing some performance and latency tests with included tools and getting > their poor performance. > Broker is configured with tcp-nodelay. We are getting about 10K messages > per second and latency about 12 per second. > > Anything you can advise, we were expecting at least 5 times better > performance and throughput. > > Thank you in advance, > > Alex. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org