OK, just checking...

Unless anyone objects I'd like to do the reorganization ASAP so we can
then start adding useful docs.

The other question I forgot to ask is...

Do we need to keep on generating the "single large page" HTML version
in addition to the PDF and chunked HTML.  I can't really see any
advantage to it - so anyone object to me killing its production?

-- Rob

On 26 April 2012 16:04, Weston M. Price <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Rob,
>        No, we currently don't have one. I thought with re-organizing things 
> it might be a good time to do it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Weston
>
> On Apr 26, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>
>> Hi Weston,
>>
>> does the book exist currently?
>>
>> All I'm talking about right now is re-organising the current
>> documentation and removing unused stuff.  I don't see a current JCA
>> book being published.
>>
>> -- Rob
>>
>> On 26 April 2012 15:32, Weston M. Price <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I think JCA probably warrants it's own book since there are significant 
>>> differences from just 'general' client programming.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Weston
>>> On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> I think we'd all agree our project documentation is not all it could
>>>> be.  I've started taking a look at at least making a start on tidying
>>>> up some of the docs so that they a) present better and b) are easier
>>>> for us to maintain.  I'm looking at the DocBook content at the moment
>>>> and I'm trying to get a handle on our current documentation set.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I can tell, we currently publish the following three "books"
>>>> from the DocBook sources
>>>>
>>>> * AMQP Messaging Broker (Implemented in C++)
>>>> * AMQP Messaging Broker (Implemented in Java)
>>>> * Programming in Apache Qpid: Cross-Platform AMQP Messaging in Java
>>>> JMS, .NET, C++, and Python
>>>>
>>>> The DocBook files we have also contain information for building a
>>>> monolithic single book which aggregates all these documents, as well
>>>> as including some other files which are not included in the above.
>>>> However, as far as I can tell, we are not publishing this.
>>>>
>>>> All the content files, used and unused, are housed in a single
>>>> directory with no structure.
>>>>
>>>> What I would like to do immediately is the following:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Create a directory structure which reflects the actual organisation
>>>> of the documentation, something like
>>>>
>>>>   cpp-broker
>>>>   java-broker
>>>>   client-programming
>>>>   common
>>>>
>>>> and move existing files into the appropriate sub-directory.
>>>>
>>>> 2) Remove the (seemingly unused) ability to create a monolithic book
>>>>
>>>> 3) Remove all content which is not referenced within the published books.
>>>>
>>>> 4) Write a proper makefile which actually works :-)
>>>>
>>>> Once this has been completed, the remaining content will obviously
>>>> need to be reviewed... and in the medium term I am hoping that we can
>>>> move more and more documentation to be "common" between the brokers.
>>>> However, I think the above is probably a necessary prerequisite.
>>>>
>>>> Are people happy with this approach? Is there anything in the
>>>> "unpublished" documentation that should be saved?
>>>>
>>>> -- Rob
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to