On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 02:01:40PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 06/21/2012 01:54 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > >the language bindings would be > >build-independent of the C++ codebase; i.e., when you're working on > >them only, you wouldn't have to repeatedly rebuild the C++ code > > Is that not the case anyway? Do they not only require the public > header files from the c++ client to generate and compile and the c++ > client library to link and run?
Good point about only requiring the heads. As I say, I'm not totally convinced that versioning the wrapper file is the right approach. Given only needing the headers and using explicit targets (i.e., cqpid_perl) gives us what I would prefer? -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpmKM38u6fwr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
