On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/22/2012 04:36 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: >> >> Very roughly I was thinking along the following lines for future >> client jars. Not sure what the rest of java folks think about this. >> >> qpid-client-api-<version>.jar --> API interfaces >> >> qpid-client-jms-<version>.jar --> JMS implementation >> qpid-client-<version>.jar --> Pure java implementation >> qpid-client-cpp<version>.jar --> cpp binding implementation (will >> contain the jni classes as well) > > > Having the full implementation in one jar makes sense to me (and having all > its sources together does also, which I think is what you are proposing?). yes sir!
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
