I didn't vote +1 bcos I was investigating a potential issue where the java client getting disconnected due to not completing the protocol negotiation on time. Max negotiate time is a new feature introduced by the c++ broker as a security measure to terminate connections that does not open an amqp connection within a given time limit. After investigation with Petr and Leonid we have found the following information.
1. This happens only on RHEL6 (tested on RHEL5 and 6 ... not sure about Windows or Solaris) 2. When it happens, a ~3 sec delay is observed btw packets (found using a protocol trace) 3. This can be reproduced with jars as far as the 0.14 release. IMO this is not a blocker, but we might need to release note it. Clearly the default max-negotiate-timeout is not enough for the java client. However the more serious issue for me is, that this delay **may** be happening during normal operations there by causing a perf issue. We haven't had a chance to investigate this aspect fully. Should we release note this via a JIRA? or should we add it to the release email and a webpage. Regards, Rajith On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Justin Ross <jr...@redhat.com> wrote: > Three votes--I didn't know that, :). In any case, I feel better with your > vote. > > Now that we have a good crosssection of contributors, I'm ready to close the > vote end-of-business today (US east coast time). > > Justin > > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > >> +1 >> >> (I have the maven artifacts staged for release, and hadn't voted simply >> because I coudlnt before the mentioned Friday deadline and you already had >> the required three +1s to release it if you wanted anyway :P) >> >> Robbie >> >> On 20 August 2012 16:53, Justin Ross <jr...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, folks. It's time again to vote on our release. The proposed final >>> RC >>> (same revision as RC3, minus the -rc3 version suffix) is available here: >>> >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~**jross/qpid-0.18/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejross/qpid-0.18/> >>> >>> If you favor releasing the RC3 bits as 0.18, vote +1. If you have a >>> reason to think that RC3 is not ready for frelease, vote -1. >>> >>> I'll close the vote on Friday. >>> >>> Thank you, Alex, Gordon, and Darryl, for testing the RC3 bits and posting >>> what you found. And thanks again to Robbie for picking up release tasks >>> when I could not. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Justin >>> >>> --- >>> 0.18 release page: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/**018-release.html<https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/018-release.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.**org<dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
