On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:13:08AM +1100, Robbie Gemmell (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13458237#comment-13458237 > ] > > Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-4291: > -------------------------------------- > > Bumped fix-for to 0.19 since 0.18 already went out before the JIRA was opened. > > > Renamed the Ruby gemfile to "qpid_messaging" > > -------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: QPID-4291 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4291 > > Project: Qpid > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: Ruby Client > > Affects Versions: 0.18 > > Reporter: Darryl L. Pierce > > Assignee: Darryl L. Pierce > > Fix For: 0.19 > > > > Attachments: > > 0001-Some-cleanup-on-the-rdoc-generation-and-markups.patch, > > 0002-Renamed-the-gemfile-to-qpid_messaging.patch > > > > > > Since the name "qpid" is already claimed on Rubygems.org, we've had to > > change the name of our gem to "qpid_messaging". > > This patch set includes changes needed in the internals for the Qpid Ruby > > bindings to use this new naming. Users will need to change: > > require "qpid" > > to: > > require "qpid_messaging" > > to avoid any potential name collisions. Otherwise, no other changes are > > required to their code.
Can I get a review and an OK on this change? It only affects the name of the Ruby gem artifact, plus some clean up on Rdoc annotations. No change to code. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpjKZAQ91z6Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
