-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9450/#review16647
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Rafael Schloming


On Feb. 15, 2013, 2:55 p.m., Kenneth Giusti wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9450/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 15, 2013, 2:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Cliff Jansen and Rafael Schloming.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Proposed patch.  It requires the work already done in PROTON-225, so this 
> patch must be layered on top of that.
> 
> 1) messenger checks for buffered output bytes in transport
> 2) removes the buffering done in the driver (no longer needed due to 
> PROTON-225)
> 3) transport reports the number of bytes it has buffered (along with any 
> bytes buffered by the SASL and SSL layers).
> 
> Cliff - I've synced the changes from the posix/driver.c file into 
> windows/driver.c.  I haven't verified the windows/driver.c changes yet, but 
> will do so shortly.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug proton-222.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/proton-222
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /proton/branches/kgiusti-proton-225/proton-c/include/proton/engine.h 
> 1446334 
>   /proton/branches/kgiusti-proton-225/proton-c/src/engine/engine-internal.h 
> 1446334 
>   /proton/branches/kgiusti-proton-225/proton-c/src/engine/engine.c 1446334 
>   /proton/branches/kgiusti-proton-225/proton-c/src/messenger.c 1446334 
>   /proton/branches/kgiusti-proton-225/proton-c/src/posix/driver.c 1446334 
>   /proton/branches/kgiusti-proton-225/proton-c/src/ssl/openssl.c 1446334 
>   /proton/branches/kgiusti-proton-225/proton-c/src/windows/driver.c 1446334 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9450/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Works against my reproducer.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kenneth Giusti
> 
>

Reply via email to