[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Keith Wall updated QPID-4589:
-----------------------------

    Component/s:     (was: Java Broker)
                 Documentation
                 C++ Client
       Assignee:     (was: Keith Wall)
    
> C++ client unable to connect to Java Broker
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-4589
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4589
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++ Client, Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 0.18
>         Environment: C++ client and Java Broker running on Redhat 6.3
>            Reporter: James Belch
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Our C++ clients were initially running on Redhat 5.4 and communicating with a 
> Java Broker running on Redhat 6.3.  Everything was working fine.  We need to 
> move our C++ development over to another network which use Redhat 6.3.  
> Because of this, we needed to rebuild our C++ executables on Redhat 6.3.  
> When attempting to connect with a 6.3 C++ client, we get an error while 
> trying connect to the Java Broker.  It returns an error saying "Reconnect 
> disabled".  It appears to be similar to the following issue, 
> "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4419";. I am able to connect to 
> the C++ broker successfully from the Redhat 6.3 client.  My questions are:
> 1.  Is this a bug that has been fixed or is there something that we can do in 
> our .18 Java Broker configuration to solve this problem?  We are currently 
> using the default Java Broker configuration.
> 2.  Do you think this is related to QPID-4419 from above?  If so, should we 
> upgrade to Qpid .20 to solve this problem?
> 3.  Do you recommend using the Java Broker or the C++ Broker?  We have 
> thought about switching over to the C++ Broker, but we wanted to know if you 
> could answer the following questions:
>     a.  Do you know how many of your Redhat customers use the Java Broker?   
> Do you think the Java Broker and C++ Broker are used equally 
> or is one preferred over the other?
>     b.  Which Broker (Java or C++) offers better performance?
>     c.  Do you offer the same support for the Java and C++ Brokers.  Do bugs 
> written against the Java Broker and C++ Broker get the same priority?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to