On 03/25/2013 06:32 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
If there's strength of feeling that extras is more appropriate then that's fine and I'll be OK with that, but then the location of the ruby stuff seems inconsistent (I'm not knocking the ruby stuff, just trying to figure the most consistent place).
I think you make a good case there and I certainly have no objections to it going under tools.
The "stand alone project" thing is interesting, there was talk of this for QMF last year but it didn't sprout wings, and I guess probably won't. Perhaps it might be time for a proper concerted think about "management" in general. Rob looks like he might announce some stuff from OASIS on AMQP management in the near future, so perhaps the time is ripe to move all the management stuff into a new space to start the ball rolling on that general trajectory?
I think it very much is a good time to start thinking about management in general. I'm not sure I would begin by moving the existing stuff around though.
I think I would begin by discussing what we all individually and collectively want from management.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
