On 03/25/2013 06:22 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
I think as an interim solution I will add a check for subjects.
Longer term I think (especially when we work on the new JMS client) we
should probably look at implementing this for Queues and Topics as
follows.
1. Queues, if getQueueName() is the same then the destinations are equal.
2. Topics, if getTopicName() is the same then the destinations are
equal.
As mentioned in an earlier response, if a Destination can contain a
default subject then the presence of difference subjects in two
Destination instances means they are not equivalent when creating
consumers or producers, and in quite a significant way.
I don't understand the rationale for your long term approach above. It
seems to essentially revert to the 'type and name only' option you
initially preferred. Why do you think that is a better long term option?
If people want to merely compare the queue or topic name they can do
that explicitly. I think the equals() method should be a stronger test
for equivalence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
