----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10267/#review18671 -----------------------------------------------------------
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/INSTALL <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10267/#comment39063> Couldnt quite make my mind up on this one. The discussion on the list was that notice would be given (again) with 0.22, it would be made to fail unless explicitly enabled with a flag in 0.24, and would then be removed in 0.26. On the one hand outling that clearly seems nice....but on the other, saying its gone in 0.24 even if it wont actually be to really reinforce the impending doom is perhaps nicer to people in the end :) - Robbie Gemmell On April 3, 2013, 5:57 p.m., Fraser Adams wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10267/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 3, 2013, 5:57 p.m.) > > > Review request for qpid. > > > Description > ------- > > Modification to C++ INSTALL guide to move "How to Build and Install Qpid from > a Source Distribution" to the top to make things a little clearer and to add > some extra comments including a note that automake is now deprecated. > > > Diffs > ----- > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp/INSTALL 1464105 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10267/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Fraser Adams > >
