This would be great, Phil! We currently are not scanning the Java code, but it would be great if you can set up the Java scan. If you'd like some help from Coverity please let me know - the mgr I worked with to get the C++ scan going was eager to get Java projects in as well - but they couldn't scan Java at that time.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Harvey > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid > > Hi Steve, > > I'd be happy to help make sense of the Java results. > > I'll set up a Coverity account now. > > Thanks > Phil > > > On 2 July 2013 15:43, Steve Huston <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, I noticed that too - and Coverity was fairly eager to get a scan > > of the Qpid Java code back when we started, but they weren't ready to > > scan Java quite yet. > > > > If anyone would like to tackle the Java scans, and is not yet signed > > up at coverity.com, please let me know and I'll help get you going. > > > > From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:41 AM > > To: qpid > > Cc: Steve Huston > > Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Apache-Qpid > > > > As an aside, I notice that they seem to have enabled scanning of Java > > projects as well as C++ now... we should maybe look to see what a > > coverity scan of the Java code looks like > > > > -- Rob > > > > <snip> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
