On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 18:50 +0000, Gordon Sim wrote: > ... > I realise after tracking this down that you did comment in JIRA, but to > me this would have warranted at least a brief email direct to the list > (since JIRA comments are easy to miss, at least in my experience).
Apologies, I was under the impression that the management spec was *extremely* rarely changed. > > I think its a bad idea to have duplicated files. For the management spec > in particular this is bound to lead to confusion, especially since it > hasn't been clearly highlighted. I already spent some time trying to > figure out why changes to the spec had no effect. I agree entirely. > > The java broker no longer uses this. However I'm not sure whether the > Java based QMF API does? I could find no references outside cpp to management-schema.xml, so I assume the file is not used elsewhere. > > If it does then having two separate copies is not in my view acceptable > and moving it without checking what works for the other component seems > unreasonable. That is why it was duplicated (Justin's preference). > > If it doesn't then I personally don't mind having this moved to the cpp > tree, but lets remove the other copy to avoid confusion. I agree, however it is impossible to have a self contained c++ tree at present without having this file in that tree. Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
