Qpid-send (cpp) and qpid-jms-send use slightly different options, it seems to me it is best to add "-l <lang>" option to the driver, and then use correct method/options. It will not require renaming, nor passing method name as another argument. Regards, Irina. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon Sim" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, November 8, 2013 12:54:14 PM Subject: Re: Proposal to consolidate qpid benchmark tests
On 11/08/2013 05:44 PM, Justin Ross wrote: > I'm all for a default. If we had a qpid-send facade, I'd see no > problem with defaulting the impl lang to C++. I just think it's > slightly better to avoid obscuring the language: going with qpid-send, > qpid-java-send, and qpid-python-send leaves the user to guess what > that first one is. The 'first one' is the only one that is actually in use at present and has been for some time. I think the confusion is at present purely hypothetical. The inconvenience caused by renaming the current qpid-send/qpid-receive would however be real (and did I mention these are the only ones in actual use :-). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
