[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14068692#comment-14068692
]
Keith Wall commented on QPID-3422:
----------------------------------
It is not that a ring queue feature would be unwelcome/undesirable, but it is
just not something that has a realistic chance of being prioritised by us at
the moment. The user population I deal with day to day rarely call for this
feature - and when they do, they normally want an LVQ.
Contributions would be welcome; the Java broker's model and management layer is
now is more amenable to extension and I would hope producing a ring queue type
plugin would be possible with too much effort.
> Implement ring queue on java broker
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-3422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3422
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Java Broker
> Affects Versions: 0.10, 0.11, 0.12
> Reporter: Alex Rudyy
> Assignee: Alex Rudyy
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Future
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-QPID-3422-Implementation-of-ring-and-ring_strict-que.patch
>
>
> "ring" and "ring_strict" queue policies are not implemented on a Java Broker.
> Test AddressBasedDestinationTest.testBrowseMode fails against java broker
> because it uses a ring queue policy.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
