> On March 3, 2015, 11:01 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
> > I agree with the name change but please don't break dispatch at this late 
> > date. Please add a utils.py with `from sync import *` for backwards 
> > compatibility, put a comment in there to say don't use it, deprecated, 
> > internal use only, beware of dragons etc.  Maybe build dispatch against it 
> > just to be sure ;)

Good point/reminder re Dispatch. However *if* we went ahead with this change 
before 0.9, I would want to change Dispatch at the same time. AT that point the 
utils module would never have been released so introducing a legacy version 
just for the one internal use would be a bad choice.


- Gordon


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31681/#review75072
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 3, 2015, 2:39 p.m., Gordon Sim wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31681/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 3, 2015, 2:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Alan Conway, Justin Ross, and Rafael Schloming.
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid-proton-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In order to convey a little bit more about what the contents do. Just a 
> suggestion.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   examples/python/helloworld_blocking.py d9a24a9 
>   examples/python/sync_client.py 82cd85f 
>   proton-c/bindings/python/CMakeLists.txt 7f54033 
>   proton-c/bindings/python/proton/sync.py PRE-CREATION 
>   proton-c/bindings/python/proton/utils.py d5e2e0a 
>   tests/python/proton_tests/sync.py PRE-CREATION 
>   tests/python/proton_tests/utils.py 727b586 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31681/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gordon Sim
> 
>

Reply via email to