[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14591818#comment-14591818
 ] 

Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-6558:
-----------------------------------

Hi David - apologies for not responding to this sooner.

Have you tried reproducing this issue on a recent release of the Java Broker 
(0.32 for instance)?  The logic for auto-deleting of queues and managing 
connections has changed a lot in the last 2.5 years so any bug in 0.18 may no 
longer be present.

> Queue can continue to grow after connection closes and does not appear in 
> qpid-stat
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-6558
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6558
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java Broker
>    Affects Versions: 0.18
>         Environment: RHEL Server 6.4, 64-bit
> Java SE 1.7.0_51 x86_64
>            Reporter: David Friedman
>              Labels: memory_leak
>
> A (Java JMS) client disconnected from the broker.  (Probably killed with a 
> SIGTERM.)  It had a queue for a topic that apparently continued to grow after 
> the connection was closed.
> We have a cron to periodically log all queues and other broker information 
> using qpid-stat.  The next log after the client shutdown does not show the 
> queue.  However, the queue was apparently still being maintained internally 
> by the broker and had new messages appended to it.  The broker eventually ran 
> out of memory.  We have the broker JVM set up to dump its heap when there is 
> an OutOfMemoryError exception.  Examining the heap dump showed most of the 
> memory was being used by the queue from the client that had disconnected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to