On 10/22/2015 11:14 AM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> If the receiver had transactional
>> work then it would remain open until the session closed, otherwise if
>> should close down immediately.
>>
> Ah, ok. In my case, the receiver received some messages, but the
> transaction was rolled back. There should be no outstanding messages which
> were received in my code using the receive() method or using a listener.
>
> So it sounds like it works as it should, only differently compared to 0.6.0.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Jakub
>
If you want to write a small test case I would be happy to validate that
it is working as intended, things are in flux in the TX bits right now
so good to check that nothing gets broken. 

-- 
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
[email protected] | www.redhat.com 
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to