[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rob Godfrey updated QPID-7082:
------------------------------
    Description: 
The code within {code}SecurityManager.getSystemTaskControllerContext(String 
taskName, Principal principal){code} creates a context which inherits from the 
current thread AcessControllerContext.  This context may contain references to 
the current user / connection / session.  

One instance of this issue is the AccessControlContext referenced from 
Queue#_immediateDeliveryContext. If queue is created via messaging layer, the 
existing AccessControlContext can hold references to ConnectionPrincipal and 
SessionPrincipal and their connection and session object accordingly.  As 
result, Queue#_immediateDeliveryContext can refer  ConnectionPrincipal and 
SessionPrincipa prebeting garbage collection of corresponding AMQPConnection 
and AMQSessionModel objects for the duration of the queue life. With lots of 
long lived queues that were created by lots of different connections the broker 
memory consumption might grow in time and eventially Broker can run OOM if not 
bounced.

The AccessContollerContext created by the method should not inherit and 
context, and thus no references to users/connection/sessions etc. will be 
retained.


  was:
Instance of AccessControlContext referenced from 
Queue#_immediateDeliveryContext is created from an existing 
AccessControlContext on queue creation. If queue is created via messaging 
layer, the existing AccessControlContext can hold references to 
ConnectionPrincipal and SessionPrincipal and their connection and session 
object accordingly.  As result, Queue#_immediateDeliveryContext can refer  
ConnectionPrincipal and SessionPrincipa prebeting garbage collection of 
corresponding AMQPConnection and AMQSessionModel objects for the duration of 
the queue life.

With lots of long lived queues that were created by lots of different 
connections the broker memory consumption might grow in time and eventially 
Broker can run OOM if not bounced.

It seems we do not need to refer an existing AccessControlContext from any 
system AccessControlContext.


> [Java Broker] Created AccessControllerContext for SystemTasks should not 
> reference current context
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: QPID-7082
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7082
>             Project: Qpid
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java Broker
>    Affects Versions: qpid-java-6.0, qpid-java-6.0.1
>            Reporter: Alex Rudyy
>
> The code within {code}SecurityManager.getSystemTaskControllerContext(String 
> taskName, Principal principal){code} creates a context which inherits from 
> the current thread AcessControllerContext.  This context may contain 
> references to the current user / connection / session.  
> One instance of this issue is the AccessControlContext referenced from 
> Queue#_immediateDeliveryContext. If queue is created via messaging layer, the 
> existing AccessControlContext can hold references to ConnectionPrincipal and 
> SessionPrincipal and their connection and session object accordingly.  As 
> result, Queue#_immediateDeliveryContext can refer  ConnectionPrincipal and 
> SessionPrincipa prebeting garbage collection of corresponding AMQPConnection 
> and AMQSessionModel objects for the duration of the queue life. With lots of 
> long lived queues that were created by lots of different connections the 
> broker memory consumption might grow in time and eventially Broker can run 
> OOM if not bounced.
> The AccessContollerContext created by the method should not inherit and 
> context, and thus no references to users/connection/sessions etc. will be 
> retained.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to