> On April 7, 2016, 5:57 p.m., Justin Ross wrote:
> > proton-c/bindings/python/proton/reactor.py, line 197
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45389/diff/6/?file=1330014#file1330014line197>
> >
> >     Perhaps these setters and getters should be python properties.  That 
> > seems to be the pattern elsewhere in proton python, and elsewhere in your 
> > patch.

I'm not sure they can.  The host and port are actually associated with the 
_connection_, not the _reactor_.  I crafted these APIs so they belong to the 
reactor API because we didn't want host/port information leaking into the AMQP 
Connection API.  We can't make them a property of the Reactor, since we have to 
specify the connection.  And I really don't want to associate host and port 
properties with the connection class.


- Kenneth


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45389/#review127631
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 7, 2016, 2:55 p.m., Kenneth Giusti wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45389/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 7, 2016, 2:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Gordon Sim, Justin Ross, and Robbie Gemmell.
> 
> 
> Bugs: PROTON-1133
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1133
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid-proton-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This involves a change to the Reactor API.
> 
> This patch implements a new API for creating outgoing connections via the 
> Reactor class: pn_reactor_connection_to_url().  It is meant to replace the 
> existing practice of creating a connection via pn_reactor_connection() then 
> setting the transport address in the connection's hostname field.
> 
> Not 100% convinced this is appropriate.  It introduces a URL parameter to the 
> Proton Connection object, where it may make better sense to associate the URL 
> with the Transport instead (pn_reactor_transport_to_url()???).
> 
> The URL parameter is used by the Proton iohandler to create the socket 
> connection.  If an application does not use the Proton iohandler (by 
> overriding the reactor's global handler), then it is the responsiblity of 
> whatever handler is being provided to use the URL to set up the socket 
> connection.  This was also the case for the old method that used the 
> connection's hostname setting, so this is not a behavioral change.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> examples/java/reactor/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/example/reactor/Send.java
>  22da720 
>   examples/python/reactor/send.py c718780 
>   examples/python/reactor/tornado-send.py 54b8618 
>   proton-c/bindings/python/proton/__init__.py 5ffede8 
>   proton-c/bindings/python/proton/reactor.py cda6248 
>   proton-c/include/proton/connection.h f8a688c 
>   proton-c/include/proton/reactor.h e91b169 
>   proton-c/src/reactor/connection.c 4a57bfd 
>   proton-c/src/tests/reactor.c 1e706e2 
>   proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/engine/Connection.java 
> feff80b 
>   proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/reactor/Reactor.java 9d67d49 
>   proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/reactor/impl/IOHandler.java 
> 40eddac 
>   proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/reactor/impl/ReactorImpl.java 
> 0eb126a 
>   proton-j/src/test/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/reactor/ReactorTest.java 
> 10c591a 
>   tests/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/ProtonJInterop.java 31306ef 
>   tests/java/shim/creactor.py 95fd020 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45389/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Updated unit tests and re-checked modified examples.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kenneth Giusti
> 
>

Reply via email to