[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15729196#comment-15729196
]
Justin Ross commented on PROTON-1140:
-------------------------------------
Our reactive bindings on top of the C core are not *especially* high-level
clients. People pick the C++ or the Python binding because it's their desired
language. They will often find use in low-level integrations.
We might in the future have some much higher-level APIs, and then perhaps
things would be different. But for most of the APIs we have, I'm not sure
there's a meaningful distinction to be made.
For me, the question of whether to have default process name and ID is
independent of C core versus bindings.
> [proton-c] Always set process name and process id as connection properties
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PROTON-1140
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1140
> Project: Qpid Proton
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: proton-c
> Affects Versions: 0.12.0
> Reporter: Ganesh Murthy
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.17.0
>
>
> The connection initiating peer must set message properties of process name
> and process id. The receiving peer will be able to access these properties
> using pn_connection_remote_properties(connection)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
