[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16049181#comment-16049181
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7823:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 322760c7cfb81f9e85ac0af8f93c481ab849a702 in qpid-broker-j's branch
refs/heads/master from [~lorenz.quack]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-broker-j.git;h=322760c ]
QPID-7823: [Java Broker] Add failing test (currently ignored) demonstrating
this JIRA.
> [Java Broker] [AMQP1.0] Contradicting message-formats on multi transfer
> deliveries should result in error
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-7823
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7823
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Lorenz Quack
>
> The AMQP specification states in [section
> 2.7.5|http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/os/amqp-core-transport-v1.0-os.html#type-transfer]
> about the message-format field of the Transfer performative:
> bq. This field MUST be specified for the first transfer of a multi-transfer
> message and can only be omitted for continuation transfers. It is an error if
> the message-format on a continuation transfer differs from the message-format
> on the first transfer of a delivery.
> We currently do not enforce this. Currently we just take the value of the
> first transfer that specifies it and ignore all subsequent values which is
> not spec compliant. We also allow it to be unspecified (i.e., null) in which
> case we default to UnsignedInteger(0).
> [AMQP-130|https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/AMQP-130] was raised to
> clarify how to handle the error case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
