[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16111063#comment-16111063 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-7434: ------------------------------------------------------- Commit 344b01e6eca5271df92f36b73060d93353c57f4d in qpid-broker-j's branch refs/heads/master from [~alex.rufous] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-broker-j.git;h=344b01e ] QPID-7434: Rename test > Mature the AMQP message conversion layer (headers and content) > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: QPID-7434 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7434 > Project: Qpid > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Java Broker > Reporter: Keith Wall > Assignee: Lorenz Quack > Fix For: qpid-java-broker-7.0.0 > > > There are a number of gaps in our message converters that mean some message > are not converted with complete fidelity (particularly in the treatment of > application headers), and where complete fidelity cannot be acheived we need > sensible rules, uniformly implemented to decide how aspects degrade. > For instance, for AMQP 0-8..0-10 allow application headers whose values were > complex types (e.g. map). AMQP 1.0 disallows this. What should the > behaviour be? Should the header be dropped? > Another instance is the length and constituency of the keys of application > headers. AMQP 0-8..0-10 have a protocol restriction of 255 UTF8 bytes. AMQP > has supports longer strings. Also AMQP 0-9 says further restricts the key to > be formed like a Java identifier. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org