[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16120383#comment-16120383
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DISPATCH-803:
-----------------------------------------
Github user ted-ross commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/185#discussion_r132259545
--- Diff: src/dispatch_private.h ---
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct qd_dispatch_t {
qd_connection_manager_t *connection_manager;
qd_policy_t *policy;
void *dl_handle;
+ qd_address_treatment_t treatment;
--- End diff --
Shouldn't this be called default_treatment?
> refuse attach to undefined addresses
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: DISPATCH-803
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-803
> Project: Qpid Dispatch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Gordon Sim
> Assignee: Ganesh Murthy
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> At present, if you attach to an address in the router whose semantics have
> not been specifically defined, you get balanced message routing semantics.
> It would be useful to be able to configure the router such that it would
> refuse links whose source/target was not explicitly defined. E.g. by being
> able to configure the default semantics to be of type 'invalid' (or anything
> similar). (Being able to explicitly blacklist certain addresses might also be
> nice, but is a more exotic use case I think).
> Messages sent through an anonymous link to these 'invalid' addresses would be
> rejected.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
