[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jiri Daněk updated DISPATCH-2025:
---------------------------------
Description:
All supported platforms of Dispatch can compile using C11 (or gnu11) language
standard.
There is a caveat that GCC 4.8.5 claims to support C11 atomics but it doesn't.
(It does not define {{\_\_STDC_NO_ATOMICS\_\_}} while in fact the
[{{stdatomic.h}} header is
missing|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58016].)
I do not see any downsides to requiring C11 for Dispatch compilation.
was:
All supported platforms of Dispatch can compile using C11 (or gnu11) language
standard.
There is a caveat that GCC 4.8.5 claims to support C11 atomics but it doesn't.
(It does not define {{__STDC_NO_ATOMICS__}} while in fact the [{{stdatomic.h}}
header is missing|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58016].)
I do not see any downsides to requiring C11 for Dispatch compilation.
> Compile using C11 language version
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: DISPATCH-2025
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-2025
> Project: Qpid Dispatch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.16.0
> Reporter: Jiri Daněk
> Priority: Major
>
> All supported platforms of Dispatch can compile using C11 (or gnu11) language
> standard.
> There is a caveat that GCC 4.8.5 claims to support C11 atomics but it
> doesn't. (It does not define {{\_\_STDC_NO_ATOMICS\_\_}} while in fact the
> [{{stdatomic.h}} header is
> missing|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58016].)
> I do not see any downsides to requiring C11 for Dispatch compilation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
