[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17358603#comment-17358603
]
Fernando Giorgetti commented on DISPATCH-1878:
----------------------------------------------
[~chug] I have observed that issue happening again last Friday as part of
upstream
integration tests for Skupper.
[https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/skupperproject/skupper/927/workflows/89cba977-e806-4754-8e87-8fae61cd8b60/jobs/4537]
The client got an empty response back. I will collect more evidences and add
them here.
> Client app not getting a response through tcpListener
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DISPATCH-1878
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1878
> Project: Qpid Dispatch
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Protocol Adaptors
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Fernando Giorgetti
> Assignee: Charles E. Rolke
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments: D-1878 @e148c.svg,
> DISPATCH-1878_fail-pn-raw-closed-before-ingress-stream-set-up.svg,
> dispatch-1878-trace.html
>
>
> I have a tcp-echo server running locally through:
> podman run -d --rm --name tcpecho -p 9090:9090 quay.io/skupper/tcp-go-echo
> And I have a router configured with a tcpConnector to localhost at port 9090
> and a tcpListener at port 9999.
> I am able to use nc (netcat) to send data to the tcp-echo directly (port
> 9090) or through
> the router (port 9999), if I run "nc 127.0.0.1 9999" and the send the data.
> But if I run it as: "echo abcd | nc 127.0.0.1 9999" I am not seeing a
> response, but if
> I use port 9090 (original port) instead of 9999 (router tcpListener), then I
> get the
> response correctly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
