[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17379925#comment-17379925
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DISPATCH-1783:
------------------------------------------
kgiusti commented on pull request #1296:
URL: https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/1296#issuecomment-879143809
Is there some criteria where these benchmark test fail? For example,
degradation of performance relative to some baseline?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Add ability to use test doubles (mocks, fakes, ...) in C tests
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DISPATCH-1783
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1783
> Project: Qpid Dispatch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Tests
> Affects Versions: 1.14.0
> Reporter: Jiri Daněk
> Priority: Major
>
> During the work on https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/684, there
> was at one point a version of the PR, which tested what happens if
> {{vsnprintf}} called from {{safe_snprinf}} returns {{-1}}.
> This was done by replacing the {{vsnprintf}} with a mock (technically it's
> probably a stub, or maybe fake, but let's ignore the proper terminology).
> There are various possibilities how to approach mocking in C. They are less
> nice than in more dynamic languages such as Java, or even C++ (where it's
> possible to subclass things). Nevertheless, it can be useful technique, and
> it should be explored.
> CC [~cans]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
