PR-168 includes all of the changes to incubator-repo. travis-ci passes.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-quarks/pull/168
I manually ran “gradle build” and it encountered an error but I get the feeling
it was preexisting.
Adding "compile project(':runtime:appservice’)” to
providers/direct/build.gradle seemed to fix the problem.
But I’m going to omit that and let the gradle conversion effort deal with it
after the merge.
The question is when to pull the trigger and merge?
It would probably be good if README.md (and DEVELOPMENT.md, others?) made note
of the rename.
If anyone would like to offer something to put at the head of such files let me
know and I’ll add it pre-merge.
Of course that could happen immediately after the merge as well.
BTW, I’m on vacation 23July-31July.
— Dale
> On Jul 15, 2016, at 7:58 PM, Queenie Ma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I will start the process of making the name changes to the website. Since
> the site contains references to the Java packages and website/JIRA/Git(Hub)
> URLs, I believe that this work should not be delivered until the other
> components have been changed.
>
> --
> Queenie
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Kathy Saunders <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Based on the discussion the last few days:
>> 5 committers want to go ahead and change the name from Quarks to Edgent
>> now
>> No one has raised any concerns or objections.
>>
>> we will proceed with changing our project name from Apache Quarks to Apache
>> Edgent. Note that we have not yet received official approval for Edgent
>> from the Apache naming committee.
>>
>> I will file the infrastructure requests to get started.
>>
>> Kathy
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Victor Dogaru <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for change now
>>>
>>> Victor
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Susan Cline <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we should go forward as well with the name change to Edgent.
>>>>
>>>> Susan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 13, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Kathy Saunders <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Should begin to switch to Edgent now, even though we do not have
>>>> approval yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kathy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
