A factor of 4 for removing those contracts and turning them into checks seems suspicious. They should not be that bad. Possibly Eli made other changes in there too?
Robby On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Robby Findler > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Were the contracts -> and/or ->*, or were they ->d? > > Here are the removed contracts: > > [enqueue! (-> queue/c any/c void?)] > [dequeue! (-> nonempty-queue/c any/c)] > > -- > sam th > [email protected] > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
