Which part is a symptom? My request for a description when there's no owner?
The no-owner fact? The unstable collects? On Jun 30, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > On Jun 30, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> Your mail raises two separate issues in my mind: >> >> 1. I am beginning to think that some of our collects need a >> PURPOSE.txt file. Specifically, all collects that don't have a >> primary owner should specify such a file. I requested this when >> you proposed unstable and introduced it, and I don't see, and I >> think it may help with discussions such as this one now. >> >> The file should concisely describe what things should go into the >> collection and what quality standards it should satisfy. > > I now think that this is also a symptom of the same problem. In fact, > unstable itself would work much better if it could have sub-packages > rather than a big all-or-nothing ball of code. > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
