That did the trick -- thanks!
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Look up the 'paren-shape stx property.
>
> Jay
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <s...@cs.brown.edu>
> wrote:
>> That does sound like the right level, in that this isn't a new
>> "language" -- by design.
>>
>> I started out by trying to create a new syntax; then I realized I
>> didn't need to; then that I didn't *want* to. By then I was locked
>> into this file structure and didn't come up for air. I probably
>> didn't peel off enough layers.
>>
>> Before I can move forward, I still need to resolve the syntactic
>> ambiguity. As I understand it, Racket doesn't give me enough
>> information to distinguish {...} from (...) from [...]. Is that right
>> and, if so, is there any chance that will change? [Zodiac did that
>> <-;.] I don't want a solution that looks like "go look in the MrEd
>> buffer for...". I'd rather not do a reader extension for it because
>> the extra keystrokes will add up.
>>
>> Shriram
>> _________________________________________________
>> For list-related administrative tasks:
>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu>
> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
> http://teammccarthy.org/jay
>
> "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
>
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
