On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote:
> As I believe Shriram said, the problem is the *perceptions* of people who > think that parens are bad, not whether parens are actually bad. If we step outside our (parenthetical) cubby-hole, we might be forced to explain how we can be so sure parens are *not* a problem, at least for a good many beginners. > Regarding P4P, I have no real opinion on whether offering people a > parens-free syntax is a good idea, so long as people who wish to use parens > are not somehow marginalized somewhere along the line. I doubt there's any danger of that. Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
