On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Michael Sperber > <sper...@deinprogramm.de> wrote: >> Well, except for a bunch of renamings (... in the direction of >> ... Common Lisp ...?), that doesn't really show yet. > > I'm not going to repeat what I've already explained in detail in the > document. (If the document isn't clear, I'd be happy to clarify, but > you don't seem to be asking questions based on the document at all.) > > If I understand correctly, SRFI-49 essentially inserts parens > according to indentation. Thus, if you changed indentation, you could > change the meaning of the program. > > P4P *checks* indentation but does not let indentation define meaning. >
Which basically means P4P syntax is not indentation based, it just has an extra style checker component added into the parser. (Personally I think the style checker should be part of the IDE, not enforced by a compiler since it has nothing to do with whether a program is parsable.) > Shriram > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev -Everett _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev