Shriram, you can disregard my point.
I didn't do a good job of making the small point I intended: if one of
the goals is to remove the kneejerk objection to sexp paren syntax
(which I think is a familiarity thing), even after dispensing with sexp
parens, you still have the things like the
whoa-another-punctuation-character-what-does-it-mean "let*:", etc.
making code look unfamiliar.
But I see that you've already stated that as not being within your
problem scope, and/or you also have the mitigating internal "defvar", so
you can disregard my point.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
