Does anyone have a preference or an objection to use this change in
the release?
* The important bit here is the sh installers for unix -- they're
currently using `plt' and `mz'. (There were some complaints about
this.)
* It's easy to verify -- just run the generated installers. (And look
inside the source tgz/zip files.) Even if there are problems,
fixing them is just repackaging the installers, keeping the same
contents.
(Clarification: I don't have an opinion.)
A few seconds ago, e...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>
> 2cda694 Eli Barzilay <e...@racket-lang.org> 2010-10-26 07:10
> :
> | Fix the names used by the `sh', `tgz', and `zip' installers to use
> | `racket', `racket-textual' and `racket-full' instead of `plt', `mz', and
> | `full'.
> |
> | (Also use uniform argument names in packaging functions.)
> :
> M collects/meta/build/build | 108
> +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
