5 minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> If you're planning to serve things under the text/html mime type
> (which racket-lang.org currently does, for example) then it should
> definitely be called `html'.
Do you mean the "Content-Type" header? I understood at some point
that this was a valid, and it sounds like this quote (from the second
link you posted):
Note that XHTML 1.0 previously defined that documents adhering to
the compatibility guidelines were allowed to be served as text/html,
but HTML 5 now defines that such documents are HTML, not XHTML.
Keeps it valid -- except that the proper label for this is now "HTML",
and possibly affects parsing in some ways that I'd be insane to rely
on. Right?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
