10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> I think we want the one recommended by the statisticians. :)
+1, not only because it's more robust, but there's the obvious benefit
of adding a one-liner.
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think we should put in a list shuffler into the core.
> >
> > Which should we use? The faster one?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
