Is it possible that your binary didn't get rebuilt? The test failure and crash seem to be in recently added tests to go with recent repairs to the Racket binary.
At Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:15:24 +0000, Noel Welsh wrote: > Since merging with HEAD I get repeatable segfaults in the prompt tests: > > ... > and 19526 exception field tests. > > Errors were: > (Section (got expected (call))) > ((syntax) (9 10 (#<procedure:dynamic-require> (quote set-local-dfs) ten))) > (Other messages report successful tests of error-handling behavior.) > Section(prompt) > Seg fault (internal error) at 0x1c0 > Bus error > > These errors didn't appear with my changes before merging. I went back > to the revision before my commit and I still get this segfault. I've > rebuilt (raco setup) numerous times. Is this a known problem? If it > is, I can push the rest of my changes. If not, I guess I better > rebuild from source. > > N. > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Noel Welsh <noelwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've merged the changes back into for.rkt and pushed the changes. This > > is just refactoring the in-vector code. I'll do a separate commit when > > I modify in-fXvector. And yes, tests all pass :) > > > > N. > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
